Quote:

---

Shareholders seemingly would rather pay, hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars rather than contact the company. They would rather not know why processor #2 and #3 are idle, to the detriment of their investment decisions, rather than contacting the company.

---

pp: Only if you assume that the above parties presenting themselves as "longs" are actually shareholders whose stock was bought on the open market. There are probably a few of those left .... If one were a paid promoter (which we now know exists, based on that very public OSC document), then refusing to take actions that would cast light on the actual workings of the "company" makes perfect sense. In fact, it would be foolish for a paid promoter to act otherwise.