Posted On: 04/17/2014 9:39:58 AM
Post# of 43066
Found a great exerpt:
"As mentioned earlier, a successful scam usually employs an aspect of a genuine technology, but falsely suggests that it is on the verge of commercialization. For example, John Rivera was convicted in the summer of 2011 for fraud. But he was not sued by the SEC for producing bio-oil through pyrolysis. Pyrolysis was not on trial. In fact this technology has been around for over a thousand years ‒ (it’s how we can produce charcoal and bio-oils for example). Rivera fraudulently claimed that “his” technology was commercially viable. It was not."
http://www.3footcrowbar.com/2013_02_01_archive.html
"As mentioned earlier, a successful scam usually employs an aspect of a genuine technology, but falsely suggests that it is on the verge of commercialization. For example, John Rivera was convicted in the summer of 2011 for fraud. But he was not sued by the SEC for producing bio-oil through pyrolysis. Pyrolysis was not on trial. In fact this technology has been around for over a thousand years ‒ (it’s how we can produce charcoal and bio-oils for example). Rivera fraudulently claimed that “his” technology was commercially viable. It was not."
http://www.3footcrowbar.com/2013_02_01_archive.html
(0)
(0)
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
