Posted On: 04/07/2014 4:40:27 PM
Post# of 36729
Response to question two first:
2) Depends on the definition of affiliation. I do not think a paid consultant is affiliated except in the doing business with capacity. Getting notes, convertible into stock, does now make him (Gelmon) affiliated with AEGY? I would gander to say, it is a derivative of the stock AEGY. So now he is a part owner in AEGY. Therefore, I would say he is affiliated
Response to question one:
1) It appears in the least, the control of AEGY is indeterminate or in flux. The pirates are all over the place it seems. No control can raise a few eyebrows from the SEC for sure.
2) Depends on the definition of affiliation. I do not think a paid consultant is affiliated except in the doing business with capacity. Getting notes, convertible into stock, does now make him (Gelmon) affiliated with AEGY? I would gander to say, it is a derivative of the stock AEGY. So now he is a part owner in AEGY. Therefore, I would say he is affiliated
Response to question one:
1) It appears in the least, the control of AEGY is indeterminate or in flux. The pirates are all over the place it seems. No control can raise a few eyebrows from the SEC for sure.
(0)
(0)
