Posted On: 03/12/2014 2:03:29 AM
Post# of 11
Latest Vitamin Spice (VTMS) Headlines
Jehu Hand Obtains Judgment against VitaminSpice and Ed Bukstel for Defamation Arising Out of April 25, 2012 Press Release; Securities Lawsuit Against Hand Dismissed
PR Newswire - Thu Aug 29, 4:27PM CDT
Securities lawyer Jehu Hand announced that after trial held in Orange County California Superior Court, he has obtained a judgment in case no. 30-2012-00567141 against VitaminSpice (VTMS.PK) and its Chief Executive Officer Ed Bukstel. The Complaint alleged that defendants VitaminSpice and Ed Bukstel libeled Jehu Hand in the press release issued by them on April 25, 2012. That widely-disseminated press release alleged that motions filed in the Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania included documents that allegedly demonstrated that Jehu Hand and others perpetrated forgeries. The Complaint further alleges that these and other statements in VitaminSpice's press release were untrue and defamatory and, furthermore, that the statements regarding purported forgeries were expressly contrary to the findings of the Bankruptcy Court.
Jehu Hand Obtains Judgment against VitaminSpice and Ed Bukstel for Defamation Arising Out of April 25, 2012 Press Release; Securities Lawsuit Against Hand Dismissed
PR Newswire - Thu Aug 29, 4:27PM CDT
Securities lawyer Jehu Hand announced that after trial held in Orange County California Superior Court, he has obtained a judgment in case no. 30-2012-00567141 against VitaminSpice (VTMS.PK) and its Chief Executive Officer Ed Bukstel. The Complaint alleged that defendants VitaminSpice and Ed Bukstel libeled Jehu Hand in the press release issued by them on April 25, 2012. That widely-disseminated press release alleged that motions filed in the Federal Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania included documents that allegedly demonstrated that Jehu Hand and others perpetrated forgeries. The Complaint further alleges that these and other statements in VitaminSpice's press release were untrue and defamatory and, furthermore, that the statements regarding purported forgeries were expressly contrary to the findings of the Bankruptcy Court.
(0)
(0)
