Hogg, no, no, no! No reason to apologize. I took your post as a legitimate question.  It was ceonica's reply that implied some level of FUD three months after the news has been digested.  I also disagree with coolnapz; this is not of any concern to TECO shareholders although it might have been for the time the news was being "baked into the cake" but the PPS recovered.  Our retrace back to the current mid 3's has nothing to do with Gwyn and that is "water over the dam".  I am more concerned about how long TECO can survive this ongoing attack.  We all know what we know through the PR's, phone calls, etc but "actions speak louder than words". I am more concerned with the ongoing manipulation and hopes that the 3rd 10Q will be all that Reid is implying it will be or we will need to wait for Febuary's 10K for our long awaited "warm and fuzzy" feelings to set  in.  I am disregarding Bull's rumor on Ihub of "cash flow positive".  IMO the 3rd 10Q doesn't need to prove "cash flow positive" but just prove to be a huge percentage increase  above and beyond past 10Q financials.   As implied by many "oil and the revenue that the oil provides will cure all".