You could be correct Hock. However since she reads this board I can only assume she will run to her friends and have her post restored . That being the case I feel it's only fair to post it here in the event someone would like to see the answer to my challenge.
This is the answer to my challenge. She has blamed everyone but Peter rabbit for selling and I can only assume this means she does not except the challenge.

First, what about the new CIO, what about the CEO could they not be selling? Could they not take their stock options and putting them up for sale?? Could there be another person out there that of the 250+ shareholders that's selling?? There are more than three possibilities. When the company did the split, all shares had to be reconciled, problems?? No, when they had the proxy vote were there more votes than shares?? No. So to answer your question, there is no reason to think there is any short position in TEVE.

Seeing that a post was posted about an award for Mr Lenfest, is it not also appropriate to discuss how he run's his businesses? So comparing another Lenfest majority owned company and how it's run to Telvue and how it is run is very much pertinent to this stock board. If you recall, both companies had stock deregistered at the same time. So if comparing how Mr Lenfest conducts his businesses is out of line, then so is any mention of him.