Its the same thing every time. Its a circle. Tabaggers run out data points as fact and as proof, and as soon as they are disproved they ignore that fact and go, well take this! Then you dusprove that one and they throw another random thing at you.

If the information is good enough for you to use as part of argument, shouldnt that information getting beat down give you pause your argument is flawed? NOPE, cuz of THIS! LMAO