Posted On: 01/28/2014 6:31:25 PM
Post# of 43066
Fine...
"SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (“SAIC”) was engaged to perform an independent review of the P2O technology and its commercial viability. The preliminary report provides a detailed analysis of the technology, process and business model for the Company’s patent pending Plastic2Oil process. The report also contains a pro-forma financial assessment of the capital costs and earnings for the P2O business model based on a scalable roll-out of three unit clusters."
I don't know what that says to you, but that says to me that the positive results indicated that JBI had a fantastic business model that was commercially viable.
I wasn't reading between any lines. It was all part of the PR.
Why do you insist on defending the indefensible?
"SAIC Energy, Environment & Infrastructure, LLC (“SAIC”) was engaged to perform an independent review of the P2O technology and its commercial viability. The preliminary report provides a detailed analysis of the technology, process and business model for the Company’s patent pending Plastic2Oil process. The report also contains a pro-forma financial assessment of the capital costs and earnings for the P2O business model based on a scalable roll-out of three unit clusters."
I don't know what that says to you, but that says to me that the positive results indicated that JBI had a fantastic business model that was commercially viable.
I wasn't reading between any lines. It was all part of the PR.
Why do you insist on defending the indefensible?
(0)
(0)
techisbest
