You are right - it was May, not June when the original PR was released.

Nothing changed, though, between the time the PR was released and the time they PR'ed their retraction of the results.  The only thing that changed was their admitting that they hyped the results to make investors feel good.  They knew the results were based on ideal conditions and there was no way they could repeat that with real-world conditions.

The original PR should never have been released to investors as it was.  It should have the necessary qualifications about the testing that was performed to put the results in perspective.

It was pure company hype, which has been the norm for JBI all along.

I think you better google how a bowling ball works.