That is a possible scenario Spiceman.  But once again, that means the timeline is extended to some future time no one can be certain of (not even Hollund).  If Hollund does intend to buy back shares, then why wouldn't they want shareholders to know about it?  Hollund certainly wanted shareholders to know the last time they reduced shares.  Why would this time be any different?

I am not trying to be negative here.  Instead I am attempting to be realistic about our upside potential.  I just don't honestly know where we stand based on current information.  I still love the "concept" of harvesting submerged forests with a space age robotic manipulator system, but I don't know how or when or to what extent individual common shareholders may benefit.  I dislike being left in the dark by this company or any company for that matter.