Posted On: 12/09/2013 2:32:55 AM
Post# of 8059
Re: ClarkGriswold #5707
grajekk, our equipment expert, pointed out the telestackers which loaded a previous API 1 ship-maybe he can expound on that, in comparison to the methods used recently to load iron at EIT
Agios at AP1 is odd and yet makes sense in other ways
odd because AP1 is cabotage terminal- which means domestic transfers within Mexico only, and I think the customs is at entrance to EIT terminal-which is the export import terminal-yet we know Agios came from China,presumably with an incoming load
but theres a lot more room for bulk storage at API ,so they may have set up a special customs for the iron
with their ever increasing emphasis/ advertising for containers, that would make sense,as they probably dont want to tie up that much of EIT w, in their opinion, 2nd class citizen bulk
thus before I learned API was cabotage I wondered why the port didnt use API 1 for iron, since theres so much room to store iron there
Agios at AP1 is odd and yet makes sense in other ways
odd because AP1 is cabotage terminal- which means domestic transfers within Mexico only, and I think the customs is at entrance to EIT terminal-which is the export import terminal-yet we know Agios came from China,presumably with an incoming load
but theres a lot more room for bulk storage at API ,so they may have set up a special customs for the iron
with their ever increasing emphasis/ advertising for containers, that would make sense,as they probably dont want to tie up that much of EIT w, in their opinion, 2nd class citizen bulk
thus before I learned API was cabotage I wondered why the port didnt use API 1 for iron, since theres so much room to store iron there
(0)
(0)
Scroll down for more posts ▼