Posted On: 11/14/2013 10:23:10 AM
Post# of 36728
![Avatar](https://investorshangout.com/images/ProfileImages/283196607_7247_My Avatar.png)
I'm surprised no one is talking about the 140 shareholders. Doesn't that seem strange. 140 shareholders for 2.1 billion shares. Does that mean there was no dilution? I mean we know we went from 500 M shares to 2.1 billion shares, but just 140 shareholders? Plus they paid off $7 M in debt during the so called dilution phase? Question is do you think it was all in-house like iEquity or that Canadian billionaire or someone related like that? If so, wouldn't that mean that they will be holding for control?
![](/m/images/thumb-up.png)
![](/m/images/thumb-down.png)