I'm surprised no one is talking about the 140 shareholders.  Doesn't that seem strange.  140 shareholders for 2.1 billion shares.  Does that mean there was no dilution?  I mean we know we went from 500 M shares to 2.1 billion shares, but just 140 shareholders?  Plus they paid off $7 M in debt during the so called dilution phase?  Question is do you think it was all in-house like iEquity or that Canadian billionaire or someone related like that?  If so, wouldn't that mean that they will be holding for control?