Posted On: 11/01/2013 11:43:48 AM
Post# of 36729
SK should have separated Q1 from Q2 revenue in its PR. The PR stated Q2 of $18mil which is, in fact, a consolidation of the Q1 (less than one month long) of $5mil with the Q2 $13mil.
It's understandable SK is not looking at Q1 as a full quarter, but the PR gives the appearance there was a decrease (18mil to 13mil, Quarter to Quarter) which is not the case.
It's understandable SK is not looking at Q1 as a full quarter, but the PR gives the appearance there was a decrease (18mil to 13mil, Quarter to Quarter) which is not the case.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼
