70425 |
Terms And Conditions Terms And Conditions Updated (2) |
CyberC |
07/17/2020 8:28:54 PM |
10103 |
We need to see the complete document, identifying (3) |
Caruso |
12/02/2017 11:53:33 AM |
10102 |
Singapore t. has the cash, so it may or may not |
truebeliever |
12/02/2017 11:52:03 AM |
10101 |
I'm in shock and disbelief. |
4sleddogs |
12/02/2017 11:51:35 AM |
10100 |
Help me out here and please correct me if I'm |
Ez_Stepper |
12/02/2017 11:39:47 AM |
10099 |
I expect naysayers to do their utmost in those 11 (1) |
4sleddogs |
12/02/2017 11:39:42 AM |
10098 |
Awesome is right!! |
CyberS |
12/02/2017 11:28:31 AM |
10097 |
No the moot is referring to the |
Wendy bird |
12/02/2017 11:17:14 AM |
10096 |
not dreaming 4sleed you are very conservative (1) |
maronti1 |
12/02/2017 11:09:11 AM |
10095 |
Based on the Microsoft settlement of $9.7 million (1) |
4sleddogs |
12/02/2017 10:57:09 AM |
10094 |
AWESOME!! Lets get this train moving Monday. |
learningthetruth |
12/02/2017 10:56:43 AM |
10093 |
MOOT ..... legal definition Moot Case means a (1) |
gimli |
12/02/2017 10:50:41 AM |
10092 |
I think 'challenge' is the noun .... 'moot' is (1) |
gimli |
12/02/2017 10:44:25 AM |
10091 |
If you can't wait a week from Monday to make an |
4sleddogs |
12/02/2017 10:39:39 AM |
10090 |
Strongly agree! Eagerly awaiting the release of |
4sleddogs |
12/02/2017 10:35:02 AM |
10089 |
"the challenge to the claims of willful (1) |
bjl369 |
12/02/2017 10:30:51 AM |
10088 |
if that's the case then this should be wrapped up (1) |
GigantorX |
12/02/2017 10:24:19 AM |
10087 |
I'm not too fond of speculation...but at least (1) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 10:23:30 AM |
10086 |
There it is: that is the correct |
NPike711 |
12/02/2017 10:11:20 AM |
10085 |
I ran it by an attorney, read my post of what he |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 10:08:02 AM |
10084 |
No, their challenge based on their made up |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 10:06:40 AM |
10083 |
It looks like there is no lawyer on the board (1) |
Fiat123 |
12/02/2017 10:02:31 AM |
10082 |
So basically their challenge to our accusation of |
moosetuck |
12/02/2017 9:55:16 AM |
10081 |
I hate lawyer speak ...... "the challenge to the (2) |
gimli |
12/02/2017 9:52:43 AM |
10080 |
Theirs, if SFOR patents were invalidated the (1) |
bjl369 |
12/02/2017 9:50:27 AM |
10079 |
Thats what I thought but the "other" board is (1) |
moosetuck |
12/02/2017 9:49:16 AM |
10078 |
Drifter, the asserted patents were |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 9:47:41 AM |
10077 |
They were validated by the IPR denial. Being (2) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 9:45:48 AM |
10076 |
Theres. Ours were validated long ago. |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 9:44:59 AM |
10075 |
Thanks for posting Mrdrifter, this is great news |
bjl369 |
12/02/2017 9:39:32 AM |
10074 |
I'm still confused and not as confident. How are |
Mrdrifter |
12/02/2017 9:35:29 AM |
10073 |
Their supposed patents or |
moosetuck |
12/02/2017 9:32:50 AM |
10072 |
From an attorney: What is your take on this: (1) |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 9:29:55 AM |
10071 |
The asserted patents are SFOR' patents. |
Mrdrifter |
12/02/2017 9:27:55 AM |
10070 |
Which lawsuit is this referring |
Ders |
12/02/2017 9:27:55 AM |
10069 |
The Markman hearing was rescheduled for Dec. |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 9:19:45 AM |
10068 |
Or was that the Markman |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 9:11:43 AM |
10067 |
They need to come up with a settlement agreement (1) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 9:09:08 AM |
10066 |
Gold Maker, thats exactly how I see it |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 9:01:08 AM |
10065 |
Thank you for posting Drifter, I think we can (1) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 8:31:55 AM |
10064 |
The Asserted Patents are the so called patents (3) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 8:24:14 AM |
10063 |
The one thing Im sure of is that the ruling (1) |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 8:21:38 AM |
10062 |
Mine was terminated for getting into a spat with (1) |
Johnny Flash |
12/02/2017 8:20:47 AM |
10061 |
I concur with you Split and Gator. The ruling is (3) |
Gold Maker |
12/02/2017 8:15:30 AM |
10060 |
He granted the motion to dismiss the amended (1) |
moosetuck |
12/02/2017 8:12:19 AM |
10059 |
"RE MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT |
Splithappens |
12/02/2017 8:04:28 AM |
10058 |
I will email Kay later. But he will probably have |
Splithappens |
12/02/2017 8:01:14 AM |
10057 |
"after conferring with Plaintiffs counsel to seek |
Splithappens |
12/02/2017 7:54:56 AM |
10056 |
That is the way I understand it as |
Bazinga |
12/02/2017 7:48:36 AM |
10055 |
I was confused at first and will only say that (2) |
Splithappens |
12/02/2017 7:46:00 AM |
10054 |
Drifter, read it over and over and you will see (1) |
Gator5326 |
12/02/2017 7:22:48 AM |