So it's a decent size group located in Baltimore J
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 04/25/2016 4:57:16 PM
Re: tradingjeff #6800
So it's a decent size group located in Baltimore Jeff... I asked a few other questions which were, for the most part, also answered... nice to get direct responses rather quickly like that.
I did ask if they would do conference calls which I think would be more responsive, less confusing and get more information out and just got a response:
"@djknows Once the timeline has been constructed and ready for shareholder preview this will be one of the media formats to be implemented."
I personally think conf. calls would be much better and then we can replay them, note progress and have accountability.
Interesting also just got response to the following... IR was asked about seeing only .01 pps and here's part of their response:
"Yes you are right and we are conservative, conservative indeed
First lets understand the new IR is still completing its analysis of TPAC holdings.
Per the PR the US FR will set-aside 20 percent of any funding dollar received.
However TPAC has heavy cash flow needs for raw materials to make new products for will-call ordering.
In so much that as fast as revenue from any source comes in, it's right back out.
So 20 percent is all that can be used for the pps formulas."
So I questioned the following:
@TPACmuse So if I understand this correctly, if the Financial Reserve were to set aside 100%, the pps could/would be at .05. And any other funds that would come in from say Purchase Orders would take the pps higher? Are you calculating the 20% from a particular funding source such as the potential loan from EX-IM bank or Mr. McKay's $5M assets stake or other?
And IR responds:
"You may be more correct than you know. For right now, the target for completing the analysis and the reporting will still be 45 to 90 days. It can not rush. We have to get this right the first time."
@djknows1 Any funding source whether be loan or investment, 20 percent will be applied to cash on hand reserves."
I did ask if they would do conference calls which I think would be more responsive, less confusing and get more information out and just got a response:
"@djknows Once the timeline has been constructed and ready for shareholder preview this will be one of the media formats to be implemented."
I personally think conf. calls would be much better and then we can replay them, note progress and have accountability.
Interesting also just got response to the following... IR was asked about seeing only .01 pps and here's part of their response:
"Yes you are right and we are conservative, conservative indeed
First lets understand the new IR is still completing its analysis of TPAC holdings.
Per the PR the US FR will set-aside 20 percent of any funding dollar received.
However TPAC has heavy cash flow needs for raw materials to make new products for will-call ordering.
In so much that as fast as revenue from any source comes in, it's right back out.
So 20 percent is all that can be used for the pps formulas."
So I questioned the following:
@TPACmuse So if I understand this correctly, if the Financial Reserve were to set aside 100%, the pps could/would be at .05. And any other funds that would come in from say Purchase Orders would take the pps higher? Are you calculating the 20% from a particular funding source such as the potential loan from EX-IM bank or Mr. McKay's $5M assets stake or other?
And IR responds:
"You may be more correct than you know. For right now, the target for completing the analysis and the reporting will still be 45 to 90 days. It can not rush. We have to get this right the first time."
@djknows1 Any funding source whether be loan or investment, 20 percent will be applied to cash on hand reserves."
(9)
(0)