Top 50 Most Viewed Posts This Week |
Today This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
|
1. Riztheinvestor: Wonder how many shares are being sold that (723) (3) |
2. Respert24: Everyone keeps talking about Merck or our BOD (627) (22) |
3. ohm20: I can't help but think the FDA's initial reaction (620) (10) |
4. Jake2212: ohm: Your comment to Respert that MRK should just (591) (8) |
5. docj: I wonder if CYDY got the blessing, if not (552) (9) |
6. BUMPERCARS: Doc isn't planning on giving us anything down (539) (9) |
7. ohm20: Many folks will never be able to afford our drug (517) (11) |
8. Plotinus: FWIW I would not anticipate an antibody conjugate (500) (6) |
9. Katangolo: I think you both are on to something here. The (492) (6) |
10. biloxiblues: I am so sorry that you V=I×R feel that way about (480) (6) |
11. ohm20: I'm probably showing ignorance (473) (8) |
12. mikeyt1818: We have to believe that with the DE looking to (466) (17) |
13. ohm20: is all that would be required to make this (462) (10) |
14. Evil Rabbit: Someone trying so hard to keep it under (453) (4) |
15. ohm20: Ohm if you read this. What’s your thoughts as (450) (17) |
16. MGK_2: i appreciate what you're saying if i were paid to (449) (13) |
17. jfl97: Sorry for my string of posts, but nobody else is (448) (6) |
18. cardamine: Interesting cause Dr. L's shares are at .21, (447) |
19. armyseal: Keep the momo going for Monday .. hit that ask (446) (5) |
20. KenChowder: Good stuff, Jake. I just want to throw in my (442) (11) |
21. ohm20: If Merck is running it they're just trying to (441) (12) |
22. ohm20: MGK makes a pretty convincing argument (at least (436) (9) |
23. Respert24: As always, you're correct. (Damn you) But in my (433) (8) |
24. KenChowder: Ohm wrote: If the study was funded by Merck and (433) (12) |
25. MGK_2: Given that Keytruda is the Darling of the (428) (7) |
26. jfl97: I sincerely hope that does not happen! I (419) (7) |
27. Evil Rabbit: nobody is reading I didn’t say that at all. I (418) (14) |
28. sunray3: Excellent, MGK, that may be your best post of all (415) (2) |
29. ohm20: I am not going to jail for CYDY! Trade on that (414) (3) |
30. MGK_2: Thanks Doc, but to some, it sums up only to be (408) (4) |
31. Katangolo: A very good find Nt2. This was new to me, thank (407) (5) |
32. Nt2innvovate: In the last week, Merck release data on (402) (7) |
33. ohm20: I have seen nothing to support the notion that (401) (7) |
34. biloxiblues: Spot on! JFI97 (395) |
35. MGK_2: Maybe Merck wanted the Phase II fully funded (394) (10) |
36. biloxiblues: Sean007 That was true in World War 2, but A (390) (4) |
37. MGK_2: thanks ohm, is the reason it wouldn't be (388) (5) |
38. Infinitehealthwealth: $GRLF at a extreme low 0001-0002 easy 20 bagger (384) (1) |
39. jfl97: Excellent comment, Resperate! This site over the (381) (3) |
40. ohm20: It looks like on Merck's website they are (381) (12) |
41. Riztheinvestor: This makes sense in a perfect world but I guess (377) (3) |
42. sean007: "Going over the wall"...is what heroes are made (377) (4) |
43. Riztheinvestor: Really good point and I really hope this is (375) (5) |
44. MGK_2: not according to biloxi (374) |
45. MIM-104: Enjoy your posts and love your super intelligent (373) (4) |
46. ohm20: Secondly, you're saying that Merck scrapped it. (370) (4) |
47. biloxiblues: I think everything hinges on what comes back from (364) (14) |
48. rodolfo: I can only second your last para : MGK should (364) (1) |
49. jfl97: Perhaps rodo and chowdy need a refresher on (362) (1) |
50. MGK_2: Yes, of course, Sean, but I had to change the (360) (3) |