Steve, thank you for the response.  

Steve, thank you for the response.   However, as you know, the bashers over on LieHub have already begun to call for the letter you indicated you sent in response to the SEC's 1/22/13 letter to you.  I think you will need to post that letter you reference in order to end this controversy.  Some may come to believe that ANY correspondence from ANY governmental agency regarding an issue is not deemed settled until there is a document supporting such.  You indicated you (or your representative) spoke to them and the matter was settled.  Did they, or are they, sending confirmation for your records that this issue has been resolved to their satisfaction?

Personally I think this issue is a red herring as they say, as I have indicated in a previous post today.  However, its not me or most of your supporters you need to convince.  I think... the only way this issues gets settled... is with a copy of either your letter responding to the 1/22/13 SEC letter, or, a copy of a letter from the SEC stating the issue has been settled to their satisfaction.  All anyone "see's" now is the last letter the SEC sent to you (1/22/13) saying the issue is still open.  There is no documentation to the contrary.

Please give the posting of supporting documentation some serious thought, or, in my opinion, this issue will never die.

(0)

(0)