Top 50 Most Viewed Posts This Month |
Today This Week Last Week This Month Last Month
|
1. My69z: Sell before putting iP value into the company, (1213) (14) |
2. Chasing Stars: Getting started on Investors Hangout. Are you (922) (14) |
3. mightycydy: CYDY's got many "Bites at the apple" remaining -- (878) (17) |
4. Rosner: Short Interest Report As of Sat, Aug 3, '13 (859) |
5. Plotinus: Granted I do not have laser insight into the full (837) (28) |
6. ohm20: ohm: how reasonable would it be to assume that (763) (10) |
7. ohm20: It is not a question of if "these guys are not (698) (18) |
8. SamaGong: From ER's Post: "The way I interpret that quote (670) (10) |
9. dfwl28: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/08/technology/goo (654) (8) |
10. My69z: Another Dr. Burger Patent: Date of Patent: (642) (6) |
11. Fumbler: If you're using Brave, enable JavaScript and turn (634) (1) |
12. Katangolo: Thanks, jfl97z. I have a few questions and (628) (14) |
13. Evil Rabbit: Something to read over the weekend Don’t have (626) (14) |
14. dfwl28: White Paper/ Journal publications. Hopefully. (616) (4) |
15. Jake2212: ER: Pembrolizumab is the generic name for (614) (7) |
16. Buddyboy20: Many of us (investors) thought highly of Nader. (601) (22) |
17. Albicuz: https://stocktwits.com/Cytomight/message/57180391 (599) (4) |
18. rodolfo: Well then, I'd be intersted in your opinion why (599) (2) |
19. biloxiblues: https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademar (596) (6) |
20. ohm20: It does appear that Leronlimab is available again (587) (15) |
21. generactor: I think it's probably the opposite because if an (587) (9) |
22. HHIGambler: There's a snapshot of the proactive video on (584) (4) |
23. SamaGong: Great post, Ohm. CCR5 has been studied a lot (581) (7) |
24. Katangolo: Why? I’m not interested in beating NP ’s dead (577) (6) |
25. Evil Rabbit: It does appear that Leronlimab is available again (576) (18) |
26. Harpitdown: Not gonna lie...I don't hate (576) (3) |
27. USS JOHNSTON: "Ohmlimab?" (575) (11) |
28. sean007: Eight months later...We have a Premie...named (571) (7) |
29. ohm20: New' genetic Alzheimer's disease may impact 6.7 (568) (27) |
30. Mrkev: Speaking of synergies as Figgs suggested, Just (568) (2) |
31. chazzledazzle: Mixed feelings about Nader. I defended him (563) (8) |
32. sean007: Trademark Elite Serial # (561) (8) |
33. HHIGambler: Agree. Let's move on, folks. Not for nothing, but (560) (9) |
34. armyseal: Is it time for we are in another quiet period (556) (4) |
35. USS JOHNSTON: Question about the current company operations: (556) (2) |
36. generactor: Looking at their client list, Borgers probably (554) (13) |
37. sean007: Not on my laptop...I saw it once...shortly after (550) (1) |
38. SamaGong: Good Luck , House-o-C! Dr. Jay himself said (549) (1) |
39. sean007: Out of the approximate thousand or so Long (547) (4) |
40. Enjay: There was an article in Nature on 5/1/24 entitled (546) (9) |
41. My69z: May 9th publication on website --- just saw it (545) (5) |
42. Katangolo: They are aware. (542) (2) |
43. Riztheinvestor: No true good point. (541) |
44. ohm20: Nor the nasty, unkind words from his former (541) (21) |
45. Vintool: Wow! I see a few things in this article we have (540) (9) |
46. Evil Rabbit: If you asked me in 2020 what the pps would be in (534) (10) |
47. Evil Rabbit: Nader’s guilt (or innocence) has been litigated (533) (6) |
48. Figgs: I bought 100,000 each of last two weeks; if you (530) (15) |
49. Mrkev: Ritz My guess would 10, if it even was. I asked (529) (1) |
50. SFLsparky: Doc’s quick response to this Walmart news tells (527) (7) |